ReadingPost.Com
Political
Newsletter and Liberal Rant
Index
Page: enter
Volume
I No. 36
11-19-02
The
Ten Commandments Display
at the Alabama State Supreme Court
{
Alabama Chief Justice Roy S. Moore
and his Intemperate Proselytizing }
author:
Vance Cureton
©
Copyright 2002
Alabama Chief Justice
Roy S. Moore took one squarely on the chin
today, as a U.S. District
Court ruling was announced that clearly stated
that the so-called Ten
Commandments Monument on display in the
rotunda of the Alabama
Supreme Court building was out-of-bounds.
Across the line.
In part, the court ruled
that Chief Justice Moore violated the Establishment
Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
And that by the placement of the monument
he was promoting the
idea that the Judeo-Christian God is the
"moral
foundation" upon
which all laws are derived. All other faiths and beliefs
by default are of no
consequence. This is clearly illegal.
The state judicial
building is not the
place to promote such a religious ideology.
It is a public building.
Chief Justice Moore -
known as the Ten Commandments judge - is the
person responsible for
this abominable waste of court time and money.
The 5,280 pound monument
was placed in the state capital rotunda late
one night last summer,
under the auspices of the Justice. { Curious he
chose a time after
everyone had gone home for the day....to do his dirty
deed. Is there perchance
a meaning in that it had to be accomplished
this way, in the
first place } Apparently this man like so many on the
Christian Right are
determined that the line between Church and State
shall be abridged and
that their Christian faith will be respected and
accepted in places both
private and public. No matter how this offends
U.S. citizens who are
neither religious or Christian.
Chief Justice Moore only
cares about what he wants. And about the
righteousness of his
personal faith. Because obviously, God is on his
side, and the United
States is a Christian nation, besides. Therefore,
the religious ideology
that he is promoting could not possibly be wrong.
This is the arrogance
of people for whom their religious principles makes
them morally superior
to everyone else. So by default, everything they
do in the promotion
of Christianity is for the greater good. The honorable
justice may have the
best of intentions in his heart. But - and it may come
as a surprise to
the justice - it is precisely because of people like him that
the Separation of Church
and State remains so important.
Religion cannot be sanctioned
by the state. And that includes Christianity!
History is replete with
horrific examples of abuses of religious minorities
by those of another
faith who are in the majority. Must we go down that
muddy road again.
The State Supreme Court
building in Alabama is not a religious sanctuary.
It is not a church.
It is not a temple or house of worship. It is a place where
justice is supposed
to stand impartial to race, creed, or color. That Ten
Commandments Monument
- especially in its prominent placement in the
rotunda - sends
a message that the state regards Christianity and Christians
differently.
It is for that very reason that the monument must be removed.
An inevitable outcome
of this decision - it will be appealed to a higher
court, and possibly
to the U.S. Supreme Court - is that the tireless brigands
of the Christian Right
will argue for example, that God is mentioned in the
Pledge of Alliance,
and that God is mentioned on U.S. currency. -- This is
indeed true.
But in a more perfect
world than this one, those references to God would
be eliminated also.
But this is an imperfect world, full of imperfect beings,
willing to become complete
hypocrites when it comes to their faith. And
a further point, that
in the two examples above it doesn't reference
which
God. For that reason,
those two breaches of the line between Church and
State can perhaps be
tolerated.
In summary, in America
persons of all backgrounds, whether they be
religiously devout individuals,
or without a belief in a Supreme Being at
all, are entitled by
the United States Constitution to fair and impartial justice.
And that no faith shall
stand one person in higher regard in the eyes of
the law, than another.
This is what that glorious
Alabama Supreme Court building is supposed
to represent. The
impartiality of justice. And the fairness of the law that
is adjudicated within
that domain. It is wrong of Chief Justice Moore to
use the Alabama Supreme
Court building and the Ten Commandments
Monument to proselytize
to the nonbelievers out there, and promote his
Christian faith.
Because that is precisely
what he is doing. -- And he damn well knows
it.
ReadingPost.Com
© Copyright
2002
_______________________________
Liberal
Rights Announcement Group
Enjoy
this article? Subscribe to our list and
have
our latest liberal rants delivered right
to
your mailbox. We will never SPAM
you.
Comments
about this article? Send to editor.
Would
you like to republish this article? Ask,
and
we'll send along our republishing guidelines.
Comments
sent to editor may be republished
on
our site or in our announcement list at our
discretion.
Comments containing crude language
and/or
vulgarites will be deleted and your
email
address permanently banned.
_______________________________
Detective
Service Or Detective Software?
Your
Choice...
Net
Detective Software
Web
Detective Service
_______________________________
ARTICLE
SEARCH:
use
keywords or phrases to locate
other
ReadingPost.Com
articles
_______________________________
_______________________________
ReadingPost.Com: Home
Page
Previous
Article | Next
Article
letters
to the editor | archives1
| archives2 | donate
|
link directory
| liberal rights
_______________________________
|