ReadingPost.Com
Political
Newsletter and Liberal Rant
Index
Page: enter
Volume
I No. 37
11-26-02
Duplicitous
Allies
author:
Vance Cureton
©
Copyright 2002
Oh what a fertile ground
for deception is the one where "allies" of
differing cultures,
religions, and histories must work together to
achieve a common goal.
Two prime examples of such duplicitious
types are Pakistan and
Saudi Arabia. Neither of these nations are
deserving of the trust
that the present administration must display
"publicly" in order
to keep them on-board in the American war
against global terrorism.
Pakistan is ruled by
a general that originally seized power in a
military coup. Saudi
Arabia is a country governed by a priviledged
monarchy that time and
time again, appears to be playing both
ends against the middle.
In other words, presenting itself as a
staunch ally of the
United States, while turning a blind eye { if
not actually extending
a helpful hand } to those within its borders
that are sympathetic
to the evil Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda.
The big news this week
has been the revelation that a Saudi Royal
Princess { the wife
of Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan }
indirectly sent funds
to two Saudi students - since deported - that
have links to some of
the 911 hijackers. This type of situation has
been all too common
regarding wealthy Saudi citizens and shady
characters with terrorist
sympathies. And this in a country where
the monarchy stands
unchallenged, firmly in command, and yet when
it comes to controlling
the actions of some of its wealthiest citizens,
the Saudi regime seems
hapless, incompetent, and ineffectual.
It is a reality that
innocent coincedences do indeed occur. But there
is a pattern emerging
here regarding Saudi Arabia. Is this only the tip
of the iceberg? In the
weeks and months to come it would not be at
all surprising that
more of these types of situations become public
knowledge. { no doubt
there is a lot more specific information known
to the authorities
that is not in the public realm right now }
Is this a sign that the
United States is still the untrustworthy "other"
to even the wealthiest
and most well-educated of Saudi's? And that
an occasional black
eye given to arrogant America is not at all a bad
thing. -- Thus
these numerous "links" between terrorists and wealthy
Saudis that pre-date
911.
And these people
are our allies?
Gen. Musharraf's Pakistan
is little better. All the while acting as the
U.S.'s good friend and
base of operations for the battle against the
Taliban in Afghanistan,
Pakistan was looking out for its own interest
in dealing in secret
with Kim Jong II and North Korea. In return for
missle technology, Pakistan
apparently helped North Korea with
some of the equipment
necessary for refining uranium and producing
actual nuclear weapons.
All of this was taking
place as North Korea was publicly proclaiming
that its nuclear program
was inactive. At that same moment, Pakistan
was acting as a good
international citizen - after having successfully
initiated its own nuclear
weapons program - and was proclaiming in
diplomatic circles that
it was doing nothing to help the spread of such
technology to the rest
of middle Asia, and elsewhere.
What a crock.
Musharraf is clearly
not to be trusted. He is a wily operator, very
poised and well-spoken
in front of the Western media. But he is a
man with an agenda of
his own, and a manner not at all unlike other
past dictators that
were ruthless in their actions against those that
would oppose them.
But,
what about the recent "elections" in Pakistan?
Pakistan is a nation
under the thumb of the military class. - Of which
Musharraf is the most
prominent member. Pakistani democracy is
not Western democracy.
Did not Gen. Musharraf prevent former
Prime Minister Benazir
Bhutto { currently living in exile } from returning
to her homeland and
participating in the elections? All on the basis
of corruption charges
that many in the international community
do not regard as credible.
The charges could have been dismissed
outright, if the Pakistani
judiciciary were truly independent. In other
words, allow the former
prime minister to win or lose at the polls. --
And on the merits of
her candidacy. Not anything else.
Let the people
have their voice.
Alas, there exists no
true democracy in Pakistan.
The war on terrorism
is important. But as it drags on to a conclusion
that may be years if
not decades away. It is important for whomever
is in the White House
to walk carefully. For as we work with nations
for whom the purity
of American ideals about democracy and the rule
of law are something
to be scoffed at in private. We may discover to
our distress that our
"allies" are guilty of ugly crimes that are not only
against the people of
the United States, but against the best interests
of all humanity.
And that those same allies
may silently cheer the next horrible 911.
-- When and if it happens.
ReadingPost.Com
© Copyright
2002
_______________________________
Liberal
Rights Announcement Group
Enjoy
this article? Subscribe to our list and
have
our latest liberal rants delivered right
to
your mailbox. We will never SPAM
you.
Comments
about this article? Send to editor.
Would
you like to republish this article? Ask,
and
we'll send along our republishing guidelines.
Comments
sent to editor may be republished
on
our site or in our announcement list at our
discretion.
Comments containing crude language
and/or
vulgarites will be deleted and your
email
address permanently banned.
_______________________________
Detective
Service Or Detective Software?
Your
Choice...
Net
Detective Software
Web
Detective Service
_______________________________
ARTICLE
SEARCH:
use
keywords or phrases to locate
other
ReadingPost.Com
articles
_______________________________
_______________________________
ReadingPost.Com: Home
Page
Previous
Article | Next
Article
letters
to the editor | archives1
| archives2 | donate
|
link directory
| liberal rights
_______________________________
|