ReadingPost.Com
 politics, news analysis, and social commentary for American liberals
a myth that is shared by many, is always more acceptable than the truth, as told by one 
Vance Cureton: writer and managing editor 

 

 

 ReadingPost.Com
 Political Newsletter and Liberal Rant
 Index Page: enter

 Volume II No. 01
 08-18-03
 Alabama State Supreme Court Justice Roy S. Moore
 { Blinded By The Light Of Christian Arrogance }
 author: Vance Cureton
 © Copyright 2003

 You thought the Civil War was over? Well, you were wrong.
 Those good ole' boys down South sho 'nuff do revile the federal
 government. This past Thursday, in a grandstanding performance 
 worthy of an oscar-nominated actor, Alabama State Supreme 
 Court Justice Roy S. Moore vowed { in a voice trembling with 
 righteous indignation } to continue the fight to keep his proselytizing
 "Ten Commandments Monument" in the rotunda of the Alabama 
 Judicial building. -- Ignoring the order of the US District court 
 that the statue must be removed by August 20th of this year.

 Judge Moore is determined that he will proselytyze to the masses,
 and promote his Christian faith on Alabama state government 
 property, and no proxy of the federal government { in this instance,
 U.S. District Judge Myron H. Thompson who issued the ruling }
 is going to tell him anything different. Justice Moore might as 
 well put on his gray uniform. Because it's going to be the battle
 of the Blue versus the Gray one more time. 

 Will the South go to battle again under the code words "states 
 rights?" -- And you thought this crisis was about religion, didn't
 you?

 Here is how Justice Moore views this fight.

 "They { the federal courts } have no power, no authority, no 
 jurisdiction to tell the state of Alabama that we cannot acknowledge 
 God, as the source of our law...."

 Just replace the word "God" with a few thoughts about the legitimacy
 of slavery in the South, and those quotes would sound like something 
 right out of a speech from the pre-Civil War era.

 And those were just a few of the kinder words the justice used.

 Here is more...

 "...The very purpose of the First Admendment to the United States
 Constitution was to allow the freedom to worship God, but today
 that freedom is being taken away from us by federal courts who 
 misuse the First Admendment as a sword to take away our rights,
 instead of a shield to preserve them for us."

 Obviously Justice Moore sees this as a battle of biblical proportions.

 They must really do things differently down in Alabama. Separation 
 of church and state is a concept they just can't grasp. But, the 
 argument is really abut something very basic. It is about the arrogance 
 of people who hold that their religious principles and ideals are more 
 important than everyone else's. Thus, when such individuals watch
 quietly - and do nothing - as religion crosses that line into the affairs 
 of the state. It is okay....because it is their "anointed" religion.

 Because you can rest assure that Justice Moore doesn't care what 
 any Muslim, Buddhist, Jew, Hindu, etc., thinks when they walk into 
 that rotunda and are forced { by the monument's mere girth } to 
 contemplate the meaning and signficance of this 5,280 pound granite 
 tribute to a religion that is not their own. -- Not withstanding, that 
 these groups tax dollars help support and keep that judicial building,
 clean and presentable to the public.

 Does Justice Roy S. Moore really care about the non-Christians
 down in Alabama? From his press conference one can only wonder.
 Fundamentalists of his type tolerate non-Christians { when they 
 are not trying to convert them }. Because the "God" that the Justice 
 "pleads" that the state of Alabama has the right to acknowledge
 certainly ain't Buddha.

 And what about the state of Alabama itself? Will the publicity
 from this never-ending court case help the needy citizens down
 there?

 Alabama is hardly an economic juggernaut like New York, 
 Texas, or Florida. Or even the currently-troubled California. 
 The public school systems in Alabama rank far behind the 
 nation's best. 

 Maybe if Justice Moore could get just as indignant about the 
 problems of health care for the elderly, or the worn out and 
 decrepit county roads in some of the poorer sections of the state, 
 not to mention the status and treatment of those unfortunate to
 be incarcerated in Alabama, then perhaps Justice Moore could 
 do something positive for all the people in that state.

 But as usual religion becomes a can't-lose platform for "politicians" 
 who want to carry-on about "what they believe in," as if there are 
 no other problems in the entire world. -- Outside of some federal
 agitators stopping them from practicing their faith.

 This is an old battle. It has been fought time and again. The words 
 and the arguments { on both sides } are all the same. And, the 
 result, in the end, will be no different.

 The monument will removed. In part, because it is simply too large,
 too obvious, and too intrusive. The monument all but proclaims.
 "Alabama is a Christian state. Founded and ruled by Christians."

 That is why the U.S. District Court was correct in ruling that the
 monument should be removed from the rotunda. The people of 
 Alabama are free to worship as they please. But, the courthouse 
 is not a place of worship. The judicial bench is not a pulpit.

 Justice Moore is crusading for what he believes Christianity ought
 to represent in public life. He knows that. And all clear-thinking 
 people realize his game. He is fighting a battle for a particular group 
 of citizens of the state of Alabama. But not for all the citizens of that 
 state. 

 { in fact, this crisis would not be occuring at all, if the justice would
   simply obey the law and remove the monument }

 The individuals in Alabama who do not share the justice's particular 
 brand of Christianity are apparently invisible to him. And inconsequential. 
 And are not in any way a part of the equation that dictates his
 intransigent stance on this issue.

 Alabama is not the place it was in the 1800's or the 1900's. Neither 
 is the United States, in general. The population of this country is 
 remarkably more diverse than it was just a couple of generations ago. 
 In these times we must be more diligent on this issue. Not less so.

 No matter how purposeful or well-intended is the Christian evangelism
 that is sweeping across some sections of this country, religion must 
 remain separate from the affairs of the state. -- And clearly so.

 All citizens of any locale in this country must feel that they are equal
 in the eyes of the law. And are not judged - whether silently or overtly
 - on the basis of their personal belief system.

 Alabama State Supreme Court Justice Roy S. Moore is over the line. 
 His actions betray a strong religious arrogance, as if he is blinded by 
 the purity of his own faith. He places his religious beliefs above the
 very law he has been sworn to uphold. In fact, Justice Moore has 
 stated that he believes "law" derives from God. { the God of the Christian 
 faith } 

 Not from man. 

 In truth, the justice has the right to believe just that.

 Such an attitude might be extremely appropriate for an individual preaching 
 from the pulpit. - And trying to save souls. And the debate about where 
 the main principles of American  judicial law originated from, would make 
 an ideal subject for discussion in a philosophy class. But, Justice Moore's 
 attitude speaks poorly for an individual who is supposed to represent and 
 protect the rights of all citizens from an impartial and fair bench. -- At least, 
 as much so, as is humanly possible.

 The bench is not the proper place for an individual who in all instances,
 public, private, official, and unofficial believes that his or her's religious 
 beliefs are superior to all other systems of faith. And that their religious 
 beliefs are "above" the same law that they have been sworn to uphold 
 in an impartial manner.

 There are many sad examples in the world today - and throughout history
  - of the abuses that follow when such grandiosity is not thwarted.

 The principle of the separation of church and state protects the vulnerable
 minority, from the irrepressible majority, and keeps in check, otherwise 
 principled men, who when in positions of high authority, are intoxicated 
 by their own sense of righteousness.
 

 ReadingPost.Com
 © Copyright 2003

_______________________________

 Liberal Rights Announcement Group

 Enjoy this article? Subscribe to our list and
 have our latest liberal rants delivered right 
 to your mailbox. We will never SPAM you.

Subscribe to Liberal Rights
Powered by groups.yahoo.com

 Comments about this article? Send to editor.
 Would you like to republish this article? Ask,
 and we'll send along our republishing guidelines.

 Comments sent to editor may be republished
 on our site or in our announcement list at our 
 discretion. Comments containing crude language
 and/or vulgarites will be deleted and your 
 email address permanently banned.

_______________________________

 Detective Service Or Detective Software? 
 Your Choice...

 Net Detective Software
 Web Detective Service

_______________________________
 

 ARTICLE SEARCH:
 use keywords or phrases to locate 
 other ReadingPost.Com articles

Search:

search tips sitemap

_______________________________

_______________________________
 

ReadingPost.Com: Home Page
Previous Article | Next Article
letters to the editor | archives1 | archives2 | donate | link directory | liberal rights

_______________________________





 


 
 

 How To ADD Your URL to...
 ReadingPost.Com's Political Links Directory
 enter: Directory

 Having link partnerships is one of the ways to increase the link popularity of your web site.
 The search engines have a high regard for sites that have plenty of incoming links from
 similar sites.

 Therefore, working together to achieve our goals certainly makes a lot of sense. With that
 in mind we'd like to invite you to add your site to our Political Links Directory. Only
 sites that are related to political news, social commentary and opinion, political blogs and
 rants, election websites, political activist sites, media websites, political humor and satire,
 political forums, news commentary sites both mainstream and independent, religious opinion, 
 and miscellaneous sites, that are in some manner related to politics or current events, will 
 be accepted.

 All manner of sites are welcome from those on the Far Right, to the Far Left.

 Hate sites, extremist sites, sites containing an excessive amount of vulgarity or material
 unsuitable for children or young teens { a disclaimer should be located prominently on the 
 index page } and sites promoting bigotry or intolerance of any kind, will be rejected!

 Here's our EMAIL ADDRESS. <<---

 Send this information in your email:
 * web site title
 * a brief description
 * your url address

 Here's our information to post on your site:
 * our web site title: Politics, News Analysis, and Social Commentary for American Liberals.
 * our description: Political commentary from the left, with a special emphasis on politics,
   religion, sports, culture, and current events.
 * our url address: http://readingpost.com/

 Thanks For The Link Trade!

 

please visit our sister site

search public records
Social Services Directory
featuring Amber Alert
 drug rehab centers, divorce counseling, support groups,
online safety, parenting and family, and more!


Cellular-Services.Net
cell phone directory, free Nokia phones, and accessories: enter
wireless services provided by the most popular nationwide carriers

 
Internet-Records-Search.Com
online records search for amateur and professional investigators: enter
use the world-wide web to locate information

ReadingPost.Com: find out what the "Left" really thinks about the "Right"
all articles are the exclusive property of Vance Cureton and ReadingPost.Com
Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004
all rights reserved.

contact: webmaster